The boundaries around what parenting plan evaluators should and should not say in their reports to Courts has been debated in both mental health and legal circles for decades. The controversy about whether parenting plan evaluators should make specific recommendations to Courts regarding access plans and decision-making rights revolves around varied views of the limits of mental health professionals' knowledge about such matters, whether they are socio-moral or psychological in nature, and the benefits to children and society of facilitating case-resolution. In the conversation presented below a seasoned family law attorney and a psychologist who is a frequent critic of the practice of making specific recommendations debate this area of controversy.

中文翻译：

---

推荐还是不推荐：这仍然是个问题

几十年来，关于育儿计划评估者在提交给法院的报告中应该说什么和不应该说什么的界限，在心理健康和法律界一直存在争论。关于养育计划评估者是否应就获取计划和决策权向法院提出具体建议的争议围绕着对心理健康专业人员对此类问题的知识限制的不同看法，无论这些问题是社会道德的还是心理的，以及促进案件解决对儿童和社会的好处。在下面的对话中，一位经验丰富的家庭法律师和一位经常批评提出具体建议做法的心理学家就这一争议领域展开了辩论。