Despite neo-Victorianism's theoretical awareness of how colonial structures continue to infuse imaginations of the long nineteenth century, and how neo-Victorian culture might challenge both Victorian and contemporary ideological structures, common practices of neo-Victorian scholarship too often remain constricted in their geographical and conceptual breadth. In thinking about the structural convergences and challenges between Victorian studies and neo-Victorian studies, this keyword entry emphasizes texts and cultural traditions that have rarely been the purview of the neo-Victorian. Informed by Ronjaunee Chatterjee, Alicia Mireles Christoff, and Amy R. Wong's analysis of race as a central function in Victorian studies, it charts alternative neo-Victorian genealogies in anglophone African and Black British literatures and cultures. On this basis, it asks how conceptions of the neo-Victorian will need to change if the field is to take seriously its anticolonial potential.

中文翻译：

---

新维多利亚时期

尽管新维多利亚主义理论认识到殖民结构如何继续注入漫长的十九世纪的想象力，以及新维多利亚文化如何挑战维多利亚时代和当代的意识形态结构，但新维多利亚主义学术的常见做法往往仍然受到其地理和文化的限制。概念的广度。在思考维多利亚研究和新维多利亚研究之间的结构趋同和挑战时，这个关键词条目强调了很少属于新维多利亚研究范围的文本和文化传统。根据 Ronjaunee Chatterjee、Alicia Mireles Christoff 和 A​​my R. Wong 对种族作为维多利亚时代研究的核心功能的分析，它绘制了英语非洲和英国黑人文学和文化中的另类新维多利亚谱系。