当前位置:
X-MOL 学术
›
Expert Rev. Pharmacoecon. Outcomes Res.
›
论文详情
Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)
Differences in evidentiary requirements for oncology drug effectiveness assessments among six European health technology assessment bodies — can alignment be improved?
Expert Review of Pharmacoeconomics & Outcomes Research ( IF 2.3 ) Pub Date : 2024-01-25 , DOI: 10.1080/14737167.2023.2263166 Sharon Wolters 1, 2 , Lisa A de Jong 2 , Christel Jansen 3, 4 , Frank Ga Jansman 5, 6 , Maarten J Postma 2, 7, 8
Expert Review of Pharmacoeconomics & Outcomes Research ( IF 2.3 ) Pub Date : 2024-01-25 , DOI: 10.1080/14737167.2023.2263166 Sharon Wolters 1, 2 , Lisa A de Jong 2 , Christel Jansen 3, 4 , Frank Ga Jansman 5, 6 , Maarten J Postma 2, 7, 8
Affiliation
Evidentiary requirements for relative effectiveness assessment vary among European health technology assessment (HTA) bodies, affecting the time to HTA decision-making and potentially delaying time...
中文翻译:
六个欧洲卫生技术评估机构之间肿瘤药物有效性评估的证据要求存在差异——是否可以改进一致性?
欧洲卫生技术评估 (HTA) 机构之间相对有效性评估的证据要求各不相同,影响 HTA 决策的时间并可能延迟时间......
更新日期:2024-01-25
中文翻译:
六个欧洲卫生技术评估机构之间肿瘤药物有效性评估的证据要求存在差异——是否可以改进一致性?
欧洲卫生技术评估 (HTA) 机构之间相对有效性评估的证据要求各不相同,影响 HTA 决策的时间并可能延迟时间......