We examined whether ABA, ABC, and AAB renewal effects could be observed using fear conditioning with social stimuli as both conditioned stimulus (CS) and unconditioned stimulus (US) to investigate the possibility of relapse following exposure interventions for social anxiety in a laboratory setting. Sixty-four participants were randomly allocated to four groups (AAA, ABA, ABC, and AAB). They received nine pairings with a neutral face (CS) and aggressive facial expressions and insults (US) during the acquisition phase, and then received 18 pairings with the same CS and a neutral comment in the extinction phase. Following the extinction, the testing phase (three trials) was conducted. The background colors presented in each phase were manipulated to serve as the contextual stimuli. ANOVA showed the occurrence of the three types of renewals, but there were no consistent results showing differences between the renewals. Bayesian modeling demonstrated that there are some relationships between each parameter in the learning curves and social anxiety. The participants were non-clinical populations; therefore, it remains unclear whether the findings can be generalized to clinical populations. The results suggest that relapse following exposure therapy is related to a contextual change from the therapeutic environment and that individual differences in learning are related to social anxiety symptoms.

我们检查了使用带有社交刺激的恐惧调节作为条件刺激（CS）和非条件刺激（US）是否可以观察到 ABA、ABC 和 AAB 更新效应，以调查在实验室环境中针对社交焦虑进行暴露干预后复发的可能性。64 名参与者被随机分配到四组（AAA、ABA、ABC 和 AAB）。他们在获取阶段收到了 9 个具有中性面孔 (CS) 和攻击性面部表情和侮辱 (US) 的配对，然后在灭绝阶段收到了 18 个具有相同 CS 和中性评论的配对。灭绝之后，进行了测试阶段（三个试验）。每个阶段呈现的背景颜色都被操纵作为上下文刺激。方差分析显示了三种类型更新的发生，但没有一致的结果表明续订之间存在差异。贝叶斯模型表明，学习曲线中的每个参数与社交焦虑之间存在一定的关系。参与者为非临床人群；因此，目前尚不清楚这些发现是否可以推广到临床人群。结果表明，暴露疗法后的复发与治疗环境的背景变化有关，学习的个体差异与社交焦虑症状有关。目前尚不清楚这些发现是否可以推广到临床人群。结果表明，暴露疗法后的复发与治疗环境的背景变化有关，学习的个体差异与社交焦虑症状有关。目前尚不清楚这些发现是否可以推广到临床人群。结果表明，暴露疗法后的复发与治疗环境的背景变化有关，学习的个体差异与社交焦虑症状有关。