当前位置: X-MOL 学术Scand. J. Stat. › 论文详情
Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)
Greenland, S. (2023). Divergence vs. decision P-values: A distinction worth making in theory and keeping in practice. Scandinavian Journal of Statistics, 50, 1–35, https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/sjos.12625
Scandinavian Journal of Statistics ( IF 1 ) Pub Date : 2023-10-03 , DOI: 10.1111/sjos.12687


As of September 12, 2023 the following errors in the print version have been found:

p. 70, first line Section 4.4, “Continuing the example, the Hodges and Lehmann (1954) UMPU decision P-value pHL for H…” should be “Continuing the example, for exterior to the open interval (mL, mU) the Hodges and Lehmann (1954) UMPU decision P-value pHL for H…” because the formula does not give pHL for interior points; instead it shows that, for μ^$$ \hat{\mu} $$ outside the interval, pHL is the mean of the divergence P-values for the interval endpoints mL, mU. This is in contrast to pM, which for μ^$$ \hat{\mu} $$ outside the interval is the maximum of the divergence P-values for those endpoints.

p. 71, line 12: “α ≥ .16” should be “α < .16”.

The author apologizes for any confusion these errors may have caused and would welcome being notified of other errors.



中文翻译:

南格陵兰岛(2023)。分歧与决策 P 值:值得在理论上做出并在实践中保持的区别。斯堪的纳维亚统计杂志,50, 1–35,https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/sjos.12625

截至 2023 年 9 月 12 日,印刷版已发现以下错误:

p。 70,第一行第 4.4 节,“继续这个例子,Hodges 和 Lehmann (1954) UMPU 决策P -value p HL for H…”应该是“继续这个例子,对于在开区间 ( m L , m U ) 之外,Hodges 和 Lehmann (1954) UMPU 决定H 的Pp HL ...”,因为该公式没有给出内部点的p HL ;相反,它表明,对于μ^$$ \帽子{\mu} $$在区间外,p HL是区间端点m Lm U的散度P值的平均值。这与p M形成对比,对于μ^$$ \帽子{\mu} $$区间之外是这些端点的散度P值的最大值。

p。 71,第 12 行:“α ≥ .16”应为“α < .16”。

作者对这些错误可能造成的任何混乱表示歉意,并欢迎收到有关其他错误的通知。

更新日期:2023-10-03
down
wechat
bug