Abstract:

This article examines psychoanalysis’s relationship to collective affiliation and group identity via its association with two foundational figures, that of the Woman and the Jew. It begins by exploring reportage on the war in Ukraine as it has touched on these figures (often with conflicting and self-contradictory messaging), and it argues that we need psychoanalysis to approach these problematics. It then goes on to explore psychoanalysis’s historical relationship to both femininity and Jewishness, and it suggests that reexamining psychoanalysis both as a Jewish science and as a discourse that takes femininity distinctively seriously, via the frame of the conflict in Ukraine, might do something for our vantage on psychoanalysis itself as a historical, political, and ethical development. Ultimately, its claim is that the mutual imbrication of psychoanalysis, Jewishness, and femininity suggests a model of affiliation and relation based on the critical category of the navel, whose mechanics might offer new ways of imagining the collective life of psychoanalysis itself.

摘要：

本文通过精神分析与两个基本人物（女人和犹太人）的联系来探讨精神分析与集体归属和群体认同的关系。它首先探讨有关乌克兰战争的报道，因为它涉及到这些数字（通常带有相互冲突和自相矛盾的信息），并认为我们需要精神分析来解决这些问题。然后，它继续探讨精神分析与女性气质和犹太性的历史关系，并表明，通过乌克兰冲突的框架，重新审视精神分析作为一门犹太科学和一种极其严肃地对待女性气质的话语，可能会为我们做一些事情。精神分析本身作为历史、政治和伦理发展的优势。最终，