Abstract:

After some reflections on the intuitive unconscious that scientists employ, the focus of the first part of this article concerns the analytic method, based on associations and symbolic interpretations, as formulated by Freud and his most important followers. I see this as a valid method when used with patients we can ascribe to the neurotic area, but not with the more seriously ill, non-neurotic patients. This distinction does not particularly concern symptomatology, but a kind of unconscious functioning. When working with more seriously ill patients, such as those who have suffered infantile emotional trauma, or have a borderline or a psychotic disorder, analysts are confronted with more complex tasks. Considered here are functions of the mind outside awareness, the problem of non-representability, and several aspects of psychotic functioning. As the title states, this article goes beyond the dynamic unconscious to investigate areas of the mind that have not yet been systematically explored.

摘要：

在对科学家所采用的直觉无意识进行一些反思之后，本文第一部分的重点是弗洛伊德及其最重要的追随者所制定的基于联想和象征解释的分析方法。我认为当用于我们可以归因于神经症区域的患者时，这是一种有效的方法，但不适用于病情更严重的非神经症患者。这种区别并不特别涉及症状学，而是一种无意识的功能。当治疗病情更严重的患者时，例如那些遭受过婴儿期情感创伤的患者，或者患有边缘性或精神障碍的患者，分析师面临着更复杂的任务。这里考虑的是意识之外的心灵功能、不可再现性问题以及精神病功能的几个方面。