Berber¹ clitics are argued to follow the main verb but may appear in a position preceding the verb in the presence of a Complementiser, Negation or Tense. However, there are cases involving a subset of these categories yet the clitics still follow the verb. In this article, it is argued that neither syntax nor phonology alone can handle the full range of clitic alternations. Instead, the placement of these clitics is claimed to involve both syntax and phonology. It is argued that these clitics undergo syntactic movement from a lower position to the left of the verb for licensing purposes. However, clitics in some syntactically well-formed positions may still be ill-formed due to prosodic considerations. Assuming copy theory of movement, the variable positioning of clitics is attributed to the spell-out of different copies in the movement chain, thus obviating the need for phonological movement.

中文翻译：

---

句法音韵界面的附着词放置：柏柏尔人的案例研究*

柏柏尔语^{1 的}附加词被认为位于主要动词之后，但在存在补语、否定或时态的情况下可能出现在动词之前的位置。然而，有些情况涉及这些类别的子集，但附加词仍然跟在动词后面。在这篇文章中，我们认为单独的语法和音系都不能处理所有的附着词交替。相反，这些附着词的位置据称涉及语法和音系。有人认为，出于许可目的，这些附着词经历了从较低位置到动词左侧的句法移动。然而，由于韵律方面的考虑，某些句法结构良好的位置中的附着词可能仍然结构不良。假设运动的复制理论，附着词的可变定位归因于运动链中不同副本的拼写，从而消除了语音运动的需要。