BACKGROUND Community-academic partnerships are increasingly used in interventions to address health care disparities. Little is known about motivations and perceptions of participating community members. OBJECTIVES To elicit community members' perspectives of involvement in a community-academic partnership to address implicit bias in health care. METHODS With our partnering community organizer, we conducted one-on-one semistructured interviews and a follow-up group interview with participating community members to solicit experiences about involvement in an National Institutes of Health-funded clinician training; responses were organized using content analysis. RESULTS Community members revealed that their participation was motivated by trust in our community organizer; they derived personal pride from participation in clinician training; the power differential between community members and clinicians in the training environment needed to be levelled. Our community organizer noted that the benefits of community-academic partnerships propagate to the larger community via community members' experiences. CONCLUSIONS Community members note trust, pride, and power as important elements in community-academic partnership.

中文翻译：

---

参与学术培训以解决临床医生隐性偏见的社区合作伙伴的观点。

背景 社区-学术伙伴关系越来越多地用于解决医疗保健差距的干预措施中。人们对参与社区成员的动机和看法知之甚少。目标 征求社区成员参与社区学术伙伴关系的观点，以解决医疗保健中的隐性偏见。方法 我们与我们的合作社区组织者一起，对参与的社区成员进行了一对一的半结构化访谈和后续小组访谈，以征求有关参与美国国立卫生研究院资助的临床医生培训的经验；使用内容分析来组织回复。结果 社区成员透露，他们的参与是出于对社区组织者的信任；他们因参加临床医生培训而获得个人自豪感；需要消除培训环境中社区成员和临床医生之间的权力差异。我们的社区组织者指出，社区学术伙伴关系的好处可以通过社区成员的经验传播到更大的社区。结论 社区成员指出信任、自豪感和权力是社区与学术伙伴关系的重要元素。