当前位置: X-MOL 学术Journal of the Medical Library Association › 论文详情
Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)
Discrepancies among Scopus and Web of Science, coverage of funding information in medical journal articles: a follow-up study.
Journal of the Medical Library Association ( IF 2.323 ) Pub Date : 2023-07-10 , DOI: 10.5195/jmla.2023.1513
Peter Kokol 1
Affiliation  

Objective This follow-up study aims to determine if and how the coverage of funding information in Web of Science Core Collection (WoS) and Scopus changed from 2015 to 2021. Methods The number of all funded articles published in 2021 was identified in WoS and Scopus bibliographic databases using bibliometric analysis on a sample of 52 prestigious medical journals. Results The analysis of the number of funded articles with funding information showed statistically significant differences between Scopus and WoS due to substantial differences in the number of funded articles between some single journals. Conclusion Due to significant differences in the number of funded articles indexed in WoS and Scopus, which might be attributed to the different protocols for handling funding data in WoS and Scopus, we would still advise using both databases to obtain and analyze funding information.

中文翻译:

Scopus 和 Web of Science 之间的差异,医学期刊文章中资助信息的覆盖范围:一项后续研究。

目的 本后续研究旨在确定 2015 年至 2021 年 Web of Science 核心合集 (WoS) 和 Scopus 中资助信息的覆盖范围是否以及如何变化。 方法 在 WoS 和 Scopus 中确定 2021 年发表的所有资助文章的数量对 52 种著名医学期刊样本进行文献计量分析的书目数据库。结果 对包含资助信息的资助文章数量进行分析显示,由于某些单一期刊之间的资助文章数量存在显着差异,Scopus 和 WoS 之间存在统计学上的显着差异。结论 由于 WoS 和 Scopus 中索引的资助文章数量存在显着差异,这可能是由于 WoS 和 Scopus 中处理资助数据的协议不同,我们仍然建议使用这两个数据库来获取和分析资助信息。
更新日期:2023-07-10
down
wechat
bug