ACADEMIC ABSTRACT One of the key challenges to researching psychological acculturation is the immense heterogeneity in theories and measures. These inconsistencies make it difficult to compare past literature, hinder straightforward measurement selections, and stifle theoretical integration. To structure acculturation, we propose to utilize the four basic aspects of human experiences (wanting, feeling, thinking, and doing) as a conceptual framework. We use this framework to build a theory-driven assessment of past theoretical (final N = 92), psychometric (final N = 233), and empirical literature (final N = 530). We find that the framework allows us to examine and compare past conceptualizations. For example, empirical works have understudied the more internal aspects of acculturation (i.e., motivations and feelings) compared with theoretical works. We, then, discuss the framework's novel insights including its temporal resolution, its comprehensive and cross-cultural structure, and how the framework can aid transparent and functional theories, studies, and interventions going forward. PUBLIC ABSTRACT This systematic scoping review indicates that the concept of psychological acculturation can be structured in terms of affect (e.g., feeling at home), behavior (e.g., language use), cognition (e.g., ethnic identification), and desire (e.g., independence wish). We find that the framework is useful in structuring past research and helps with new predictions and interventions. We, for example, find a crucial disconnect between theory and practice, which will need to be resolved in the future.

中文翻译：

---

移民经历：心理适应的概念框架和系统范围审查。

学术摘要 研究心理文化适应的主要挑战之一是理论和测量方法的巨大异质性。这些不一致使得比较过去的文献变得困难，阻碍了直接的测量选择，并抑制了理论整合。为了构建文化适应，我们建议利用人类经验的四个基本方面（想要、感觉、思考和做）作为概念框架。我们使用这个框架对过去的理论（最终 N = 92）、心理测量（最终 N = 233）和实证文献（最终 N = 530）建立了理论驱动的评估。我们发现该框架允许我们检查和比较过去的概念化。例如，与理论著作相比，实证著作深入研究了文化适应的更内在的方面（即动机和感受）。然后，我们讨论该框架的新颖见解，包括其时间分辨率、其全面和跨文化的结构，以及该框架如何帮助未来透明和实用的理论、研究和干预措施。公共摘要本系统范围界定审查表明，心理文化适应的概念可以根据情感（例如，在家的感觉）、行为（例如，语言使用）、认知（例如，种族认同）和欲望（例如，独立）来构建。希望）。我们发现该框架对于构建过去的研究很有用，并有助于新的预测和干预。例如，我们发现理论与实践之间存在重大脱节，这需要在未来得到解决。