Agritourism has generally been analysed in relation to the conventional economy and is therefore occasionally concluded to be inefficient. The contribution of the article is to show that agritourism must be understood from a different logic. Applying the Chayanovian concept of "differential optima", we obtain four conclusions: a) Agritourism can only be understood by recognizing the exceptionality of peasant logic; b) no income source is independent in a pluriactive economy, and cannot be studied in isolation; c) tourism does not have a unidirectional impact on depeasantization or repeasantization processes, but rather depends on the economic context and the strategies of each family unit; and d) peasant logic makes it possible to manage the vulnerability of the tourism sector (resilience).

人们通常将农业旅游与传统经济联系起来进行分析，因此有时会被认为效率低下。文章的贡献在于表明必须从不同的逻辑来理解农业旅游。应用查亚诺夫的“差异最优”概念，我们得到四个结论：a）只有认识到农民逻辑的特殊性，才能理解农业旅游；b) 在多元化经济中，没有任何收入来源是独立的，不能孤立地研究；c) 旅游业不会对非农化或再农化进程产生单向影响，而是取决于经济背景和每个家庭单位的战略；d) 农民的逻辑使得管理旅游部门的脆弱性（复原力）成为可能。