当前位置: X-MOL 学术Philosophies › 论文详情
Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)
What I Am and What I Am Not: Destruktion of the Mind–Body Problem
Philosophies Pub Date : 2023-11-21 , DOI: 10.3390/philosophies8060110
Javier A. Galadí 1
Affiliation  

The German word destruktion is used here in the sense that philosophy should destroy some ontological concepts and the everyday meanings of certain words. Tradition allows the transmission of knowledge, but it can perpetuate certain prejudices. According to Heidegger, tradition transmits, but it also conceals. Tradition induces self-evidence and prevents us from accessing the origin of concepts. It makes us believe that we do not need to return to that origin. Making tradition transparent dissolves the concealments it has provoked. Here, I apply this idea to the mind–body problem, which has inherited occultations that are born from Descartes himself. As a result, a new philosophical framework for research on consciousness emerges: that, as an individual cognitive being, I cannot avoid splitting reality into what I am and what I am not, extending then the individual duality to a collective error transmitted culturally.

中文翻译:

我是什么和我不是什么:身心问题的毁灭

这里使用德语单词“destruktion”,意思是哲学应该摧毁一些本体论概念和某些词语的日常含义。传统允许知识的传播,但它也可能使某些偏见永久化。海德格尔认为,传统传递着,但也隐藏着。传统导致不证自明,并阻止我们了解概念的起源。它让我们相信我们不需要回到那个原点。使传统变得透明可以消除它所引发的隐秘。在这里,我将这个想法应用于心身问题,它继承了笛卡尔本人所产生的掩星现象。结果,一个新的意识研究哲学框架出现了:作为一个个体认知存在,我不可避免地将现实分裂为我是什么和我不是什么,然后将个体二元性延伸为文化上传播的集体错误。
更新日期:2023-11-24
down
wechat
bug