This study investigated stressors and strains, resources, and well-being among Black working caregivers (BWC) and White working caregivers (WWC) who participated in the Midlife in the United States study (Black: n  =  49, White: n  =  250). Comparisons were made between BWC and WWC for primary caregiving stressors, secondary strains, resources, and well-being, and hierarchical regression models tested associations among these factors. BWC reported less negative work-to-family spillover, more perceived control and religious/spiritual coping, and higher positive affect than WWC, complementing existing evidence of greater resilience among BWC. Secondary strains stemming from the workplace had stronger associations with well-being than primary caregiving stressors, confirming that the workplace deserves greater attention in stress research and interventions for working caregivers. Finally, perceived control, optimism, and family support were important resources for well-being for both BWC and WWC, substantiating their valuable role in interventions for working caregivers.

中文翻译：

---

与工作护理人员福祉相关的因素：美国黑人和白人工作护理人员之间的比较。

本研究调查了参与美国中年研究的黑人工作护理人员 (BWC) 和白人工作护理人员 (WWC) 的压力源和压力、资源和幸福感（黑人：n = 49，白人：n = 250） 。对 BWC 和 WWC 的主要护理压力源、次要压力、资源和幸福感进行了比较，并使用分层回归模型测试了这些因素之间的关联。BWC 报告称，与 WWC 相比，工作对家庭的负面溢出更少，感知控制和宗教/精神应对能力更强，积极影响更高，补充了 BWC 更强复原力的现有证据。与主要护理压力源相比，来自工作场所的次要压力与幸福感的关联性更强，这证实工作场所值得在压力研究和工作护理人员干预措施中得到更多关注。最后，感知控制、乐观和家庭支持是 BWC 和 WWC 福祉的重要资源，证实了它们在工作护理人员干预中的宝贵作用。