Since the research on contemporary personality models—and psychopathology—mainly originate from the Western world, we aimed to test the factorial structure of two trait systems assessed with the Personality Inventory for DSM-5 (PID-5) in a non-Western sample and to compare the extracted models' relative associations with binge eating disorder (BED) and bipolar spectrum disorder (BSD) symptoms. A community sample (N = 516; 72% female) was administered the PID-5, which can operationalize both the DSM-5 and ICD-11 systems. The factor structures of both systems were tested using exploratory structural equation modeling (ESEM). The congruence coefficients of all factor loadings with international studies were calculated. The Binge Eating Scale (BES), Bipolar Spectrum Diagnostic Scale (BSDS), and Hypomania Checklist-32-Revised (HCL-32) were used to measure the criterion variables. Linear regression models were used for comparing the DSM-5 and ICD-11 systems in predicting the BED and BSD. The findings supported five-factor solutions for both trait systems. Both systems significantly predicted dimensional measures of both BED and BSD (all p < 0.001). The present findings support an acceptable five-factor structure for both personality systems in the non-Western sample. Different algorithms of maladaptive domains on both systems are related to binge eating and bipolar spectrum psychopathology.

中文翻译：

---

DSM-5 和 ICD-11 特征系统五因素结构的可重复性及其与暴食和双相谱系精神病理学的关联

由于当代人格模型和精神病理学的研究主要起源于西方世界，我们的目的是在非西方样本中测试用 DSM-5 人格量表 (PID-5) 评估的两个特质系统的因子结构，以及比较提取的模型与暴食症 (BED) 和双向情感障碍 (BSD) 症状的相对关联。对社区样本（N  = 516；72% 女性）进行了 PID-5，该样本可以运行 DSM-5 和 ICD-11 系统。使用探索性结构方程模型（ESEM）测试两个系统的因子结构。计算所有因子负荷与国际研究的一致性系数。使用暴食量表（BES）、双相谱诊断量表（BSDS）和轻躁狂检查表-32-修订版（HCL-32）来测量标准变量。使用线性回归模型来比较 DSM-5 和 ICD-11 系统在预测 BED 和 BSD 方面的作用。研究结果支持这两个特质系统的五因素解决方案。两个系统均显着预测了 BED 和 BSD 的尺寸测量（所有p  < 0.001）。目前的研究结果支持非西方样本中两种人格系统可接受的五因素结构。两个系统上适应不良域的不同算法都与暴食和双相谱精神病理学有关。