THE PROBLEM Most U.S. states lack a minimum age of juvenile legal jurisdiction, which leaves young children vulnerable to a harsh, punitive system that causes lifelong adverse health and social outcomes. However, partnership between academics, advocates, and policymakers can catalyze legislative change to set minimum ages. PURPOSE OF ARTICLE We, an academic pediatrician and social worker, describe our stakeholder-policymaker-academic partnered research that led to the passage of California Senate Bill 439, which excludes children under age 12 from eligibility for juvenile legal prosecution. To stimulate future efforts, we also describe how the initial partnership led to a national coalition through which we are partnering with stakeholders across the United States to influence minimum age laws nationwide. KEY POINTS Stakeholder-policymaker-academic partners can contribute synergistically in the research-to-policymaking process. CONCLUSIONS Through a stakeholder-policymaker-academic partnership, we were able to influence the passage of a minimum age law for the juvenile legal system in California. Lessons learned in this collaboration can be applied by researchers across disciplines who wish to influence policy.

中文翻译：

---

加州青少年法律制度的最低年龄：推动立法变革的合作研究的经验教训。

问题美国大多数州都缺乏少年司法管辖权的最低年龄，这使得幼儿很容易受到严厉的惩罚性制度的影响，从而导致终身不利的健康和社会后果。然而，学者、倡导者和政策制定者之间的合作可以促进立法变革，以设定最低年龄。文章目的 作为一名学术儿科医生和社会工作者，我们描述了我们的利益相关者-政策制定者-学术界合作研究，该研究导致加州参议院第 439 号法案的通过，该法案将 12 岁以下儿童排除在青少年法律起诉的资格之外。为了激励未来的努力，我们还描述了最初的伙伴关系如何形成一个全国联盟，通过该联盟，我们与美国各地的利益相关者合作，影响全国的最低年龄法。要点 利益相关者-政策制定者-学术合作伙伴可以在研究到政策制定的过程中协同做出贡献。结论 通过利益相关者-政策制定者-学术界的合作，我们能够影响加利福尼亚州青少年法律制度最低年龄法的通过。希望影响政策的跨学科研究人员可以应用在这次合作中吸取的经验教训。