Purpose

The authors revisit the notion of co-production, highlight more critical and re-politicized forms of co-production and introduce three principles for its operationalization. The paper’s viewpoint aims to find entry points for enabling more equitable disaster research and actions via co-production.

Design/methodology/approach

The authors draw insights from the authors’ reflections as climate and disaster researchers and literature on knowledge politics in the context of disaster and climate change, especially within critical disaster studies and feminist political ecology.

Findings

Disaster studies can better contribute to disaster risk reduction via political co-production and situating local and Indigenous knowledge at the center through three principles, i.e. ensuring knowledge plurality, surfacing norms and assumptions in knowledge production and driving actions that tackle existing knowledge (and broader sociopolitical) structures.

Originality/value

The authors draw out three principles to enable the political function of co-production based on firsthand experiences of working with local and Indigenous peoples and insights from a diverse set of co-production, feminist political ecology and critical disaster studies literature. Future research can observe how it can utilize these principles in its respective contexts.

中文翻译：

---

重新审视联合生产：从知识多元化到减少灾害风险的行动

目的

作者重新审视了联合制作的概念，强调了更具批判性和重新政治化的联合制作形式，并介绍了其运作的三个原则。该论文的观点旨在寻找切入点，通过联合生产实现更公平的灾害研究和行动。

设计/方法论/途径

作者从作者作为气候和灾害研究人员的反思以及灾害和气候变化背景下的知识政治文献中汲取了见解，特别是在批判性灾害研究和女权主义政治生态学领域。

发现

灾害研究可以通过政治合作更好地促进减少灾害风险，并通过三项原则将地方和土著知识置于中心，即确保知识多元化、在知识生产中提出规范和假设以及推动解决现有知识（以及更广泛的社会政治问题）的行动。 ) 结构。

原创性/价值

作者根据与当地和原住民合作的第一手经验以及来自各种合作制作、女权主义政治生态学和批判性灾难研究文献的见解，提出了实现合作制作政治功能的三项原则。未来的研究可以观察如何在各自的背景下利用这些原则。