Journal analyses have documented the historical neglect of research pertaining to the Majority World in psychological science, and the need for inclusivity is clearly articulated to ensure a science that is comprehensive and globally applicable. However, no systematic efforts have explored the perspectives of researchers working with Majority World communities regarding the challenges they experience in conducting and disseminating research and ways to address them. Our aim was to explore these challenges from the perspective of these researchers using an embedded mixed-methods design. Based on responses of 232 researchers who engage in psychological research with Majority World communities (68.1% from Africa, Asia, or Latin America, remaining from the Minority World), we identified challenges in three areas: (a) stemming from an inherent bias against Majority World research, (b) experienced by all researchers, which nonetheless are heightened for those engaging in research with Majority World populations, and (c) specific to researchers affiliated with Majority World institutions. Based on the findings, we recommend journal editorial teams and funding agencies: (a) acknowledge and address the bias inherent in the publication and funding process, (b) recruit editorial team members, program officers, and reviewers from the Majority World, (c) train editorial team members, program officers, and reviewers from the Minority World to thoughtfully evaluate Majority World research, and (d) provide resources for researchers affiliated with Majority World institutions. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2023 APA, all rights reserved).

中文翻译：

---

参与大多数世界研究以促进多样化和全球心理科学的研究人员的观点。

期刊分析记录了历史上对大多数世界心理科学研究的忽视，并且明确阐述了包容性的需要，以确保科学的全面性和全球适用性。然而，还没有系统性的努力探讨与大多数世界社区合作的研究人员对他们在进行和传播研究过程中遇到的挑战以及解决这些挑战的方法的看法。我们的目标是使用嵌入式混合方法设计从这些研究人员的角度探索这些挑战。根据 232 名在多数世界社区从事心理学研究的研究人员（68.1% 来自非洲、亚洲或拉丁美洲，其余来自少数世界）的回答，我们确定了三个领域的挑战：(a) 源于对少数群体世界的固有偏见多数世界研究，(b) 所有研究人员都经历过，但对于那些从事多数世界人口研究的人来说，这种体验得到了加强；(c) 专门针对属于多数世界机构的研究人员。根据调查结果，我们建议期刊编辑团队和资助机构：(a) 承认并解决出版和资助过程中固有的偏见，(b) 从大多数世界招募编辑团队成员、项目官员和审稿人，(c) ) 培训来自少数世界的编辑团队成员、项目官员和审稿人，以深思熟虑地评估多数世界的研究，以及 (d) 为附属于多数世界机构的研究人员提供资源。（PsycInfo 数据库记录 (c) 2023 APA，保留所有权利）。