Regulatory changes to the Lacey Act and recent petitions to add aquaculture species in trade to the list of injurious wildlife could lead to prohibitions of interstate movement of live aquatic organisms with the potential for unintended, negative economic consequences. In this analysis, the economic impact of the potential federal prohibition of interstate transport of seven aquaculture species (blue catfish, tilapia, red swamp crawfish, grass carp, koi, guppy, and goldfish) currently in trade was assessed. Total economic impact was estimated to be $452 million (USD) annually, with a loss of 4819 jobs and a loss of $35 million in tax revenue. Effects could potentially occur on the largest sectors of U.S. aquaculture in as many as 80% of U.S. states and result in negative economic effects on as much as 21% of U.S. aquaculture farms.

中文翻译：

---

有害物种对美国水产养殖的潜在经济影响 主要水产养殖物种清单

《雷斯法案》的监管变化以及最近将贸易中的水产养殖物种添加到有害野生动物名单中的请愿可能会导致活水生生物的州际运输被禁止，从而可能造成意想不到的负面经济后果。在本分析中，评估了联邦可能禁止目前交易的七种水产养殖品种（蓝鲶鱼、罗非鱼、红沼泽小龙虾、草鱼、锦鲤、孔雀鱼和金鱼）的州际运输的经济影响。据估计，每年的总经济影响为 4.52 亿美元，其中包括 4,819 个工作岗位的流失和 3,500 万美元的税收损失。美国多达 80% 的州的最大水产养殖部门可能会受到影响，并对多达 21% 的美国水产养殖场造成负面经济影响。