Introduction

Despite the recognition of the right to sexual identity and expression for all people, individuals with intellectual disabilities continue to face significant restrictions in these aspects of their lives. The prevailing myths and stereotypes surrounding their sexual-affective relationships place people with intellectual disabilities—especially women—in a position of great vulnerability.

Methods

A systematic literature review was conducted, examining the content of the following databases: BASE, Dialnet, ERIC, La Referencia, Microsoft Academic, Redalyc, REDIB, Redined, Science Direct, Scopus, Web of Science, and World Wide Science. A total of 178 potentially relevant articles were identified, out of which 11 met the eligibility criteria. Finally, the themes covered in the articles were identified and analyzed.

Results

The results obtained were classified into six categories: perceptions regarding sex and sexuality, experiences of abuse, views and experiences of relationships between couples, the LGTBIQ + community, knowledge about contraception and related experiences, and, finally, beliefs regarding gender scripts.

Conclusions

This study offers valuable insights into the knowledge (or lack thereof) and beliefs regarding sex and sexuality, experiences of abuse among women with intellectual disabilities, the lack of independence and external intervention, and the influence of traditional gender scripts. Furthermore, this research also establishes a theoretical foundation for future support resources and initiatives, as well as social and public implications.

中文翻译：

---

智力障碍女性对情感性关系的看法：系统文献综述

介绍

尽管承认所有人的性认同和表达权，但智障人士在生活的这些方面仍然面临重大限制。围绕性情感关系的普遍神话和刻板印象使智障人士（尤其是女性）处于非常脆弱的境地。

方法

我们进行了系统的文献综述，检查了以下数据库的内容：BASE、Dialnet、ERIC、La Referencia、微软学术、Redalyc、REDIB、Redined、Science Direct、Scopus、Web of Science 和 World Wide Science。总共确定了 178 篇潜在相关文章，其中 11 篇符合资格标准。最后，确定并分析了文章中涵盖的主题。

结果

获得的结果分为六类：对性和性行为的看法、虐待经历、夫妻关系的看法和经历、LGTBIQ+社区、避孕知识和相关经历，以及最后对性别脚本的信念。

结论

这项研究为有关性和性行为的知识（或缺乏）和信仰、智力障碍妇女的虐待经历、缺乏独立性和外部干预以及传统性别脚本的影响提供了宝贵的见解。此外，这项研究还为未来的支持资源和举措以及社会和公共影响奠定了理论基础。