Globalization may cause companies to broaden their customer bases, operate internationally, and serve more customers. However, it also entails dangers, including shifting circumstances, disruptions, and elevated prices. To address these issues, outsourcing has evolved, lowering outputs and service costs. To mitigate these risks, businesses employ strategies such as interventionism, protectionism, and regionalization. By investigating and simulating the interplay of outsourcing approaches to equip businesses with supply chain resilience (SCRES), this study aims to close the knowledge gap between the existing knowledge and global supply chain (GSC) risk management practices. To choose the best alternative for our case study company, we analyzed four distinct outsourcing techniques, namely offshoring, reshoring, nearshoring, and farshoring; furthermore, we investigated the outsourcing elements typically taken into account to achieve resilience. The results indicated that the reshoring method would be the most promising one for this company, under specific circumstances, in terms of attaining resilience in the manufacturing industry.

全球化可能会促使公司扩大客户群、国际化运营并服务更多客户。然而，它也带来了危险，包括环境变化、中断和价格上涨。为了解决这些问题，外包不断发展，降低了产出和服务成本。为了减轻这些风险，企业采取干预主义、保护主义和区域化等策略。通过调查和模拟外包方法的相互作用，为企业提供供应链弹性（SCRES），本研究旨在缩小现有知识与全球供应链（GSC）风险管理实践之间的知识差距。为了为我们的案例研究公司选择最佳替代方案，我们分析了四种不同的外包技术，即离岸、回流、近岸和远岸；此外，我们还调查了为实现弹性而通常考虑的外包要素。结果表明，在特定情况下，就恢复制造业的弹性而言，回流方法将是该公司最有希望的方法。