Amidst well-documented hostile migration policies, this article explores how logics of criminalisation seep into the lives of activists and citizens, providing assistance, relief, advocacy, and other forms of support to migrant people. As presences considered legal and legitimate, solidarity actors inhabit distinct subjectivities from those of people migrating informally, yet state authorities interpret their acts as problematic and subject them to intrusive modes of policing. Drawing on critical border studies and feminist geography, this article homes in on less spectacular modes of criminalisation that target them in the intimacy of their everyday lives, threatening their sense of security through opaque surveillance, attacks on their emotions, employment prospects and family life. Drawing on ethnographic research carried out among these groups in Morocco and northern France, we conceptualise this mode of criminalisation as insidious harassment, examining the entanglement of geopolitics, emotions, and the intimate at these migration pressure points. Without decentring migrants as the primary targets of violent bordering, it broadens our understanding of these regimes by drawing attention to the ways in which they viscerally target those who work to protect the rights of migrant people.

中文翻译：

---

阴险的骚扰：法国和摩洛哥的刑事定罪、团结和移民

在有据可查的敌对移民政策中，本文探讨了刑事定罪的逻辑如何渗透到活动人士和公民的生活中，为移民提供援助、救济、宣传和其他形式的支持。由于存在被认为是合法和合法的，团结行动者与非正规移徙者具有不同的主观性，但国家当局将他们的行为解释为有问题的，并将他们置于侵入性的治安模式之下。本文借鉴批判性边境研究和女权主义地理学，着眼于不那么引人注目的定罪模式，这些模式针对的是她们日常生活中的亲密关系，通过不透明的监视、对她们情绪、就业前景和家庭生活的攻击，威胁她们的安全感。借鉴在摩洛哥和法国北部这些群体中进行的人种学研究，我们将这种定罪模式概念化为阴险的骚扰，审视地缘政治、情感的纠缠，以及这些迁移压力点的亲密关系。它没有将移民作为暴力边境的主要目标，而是通过提请人们关注这些政权如何本能地针对那些致力于保护移民权利的人，从而拓宽了我们对这些政权的理解。