A response to Rosalind Dixon’s Responsive Judicial Review (Oxford University Press 2023) assessing her theory’s prospects and caveats in the Romanian constitutional context. The piece analyses recent case law from the Romanian Constitutional Court and highlights three important shortcomings that limit the applicability of Dixon’s framework: the tendency toward formalism in constitutional interpretation, an impoverished rights review culture, and the persistent conflictual positioning of the Constitutional Court vis-à-vis other constitutional actors. The article ends by speculating on developments that may yet render responsive judicial review more of a reality in Romanian constitutionalism than present conditions may allow.

对罗莎琳德·迪克森 (Rosalind Dixon) 的《响应式司法评论》 （牛津大学出版社 2023 年）的回应，该评论评估了她的理论在罗马尼亚宪法背景下的前景和警告。本文分析了罗马尼亚宪法法院最近的判例法，并强调了限制狄克逊框架适用性的三个重要缺陷：宪法解释的形式主义倾向、贫乏的权利审查文化以及宪法法院相对于宪法法院的持续冲突定位。 - 与其他宪法行为者相比。文章最后推测了一些发展，这些发展可能使响应性司法审查在罗马尼亚宪政中比目前条件所允许的更加现实。