当前位置: X-MOL 学术The Legal History Review › 论文详情
Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)
Testamentary law in late Medieval Dubrovnik: A case study of the testament of notary Thomasinus de Savere (1284)
The Legal History Review ( IF 0.146 ) Pub Date : 2023-12-22 , DOI: 10.1163/15718190-20233411
Henrik-Riko Held

Summary

This paper explores testamentary law in late medieval Dubrovnik (Ragusa) by analysing the testaments made by notary Thomasinus de Savere, working at Dubrovnik, 1277–1286. De Savere was an educated notary, originating from Reggio Emilia in Italy. He greatly contributed to the spread of doctrinal elements of ius commune in Dubrovnik. In determining the reach of his influence on testamentary law, I will first examine inheritance law in Dubrovnik at the time, followed by an analysis of the testaments De Savere composed for the local population. I will then compare these testaments with the testament De Savere made for himself (1284). The latter differs from the testaments composed for the locals, as it is doctrinally in line with the latest developments of the ius commune. I will discuss the possible reasons and relevance of this difference.



中文翻译:

中世纪晚期杜布罗夫尼克的遗嘱法:公证人托马西努斯·德·萨维尔遗嘱的案例研究(1284)

概括

本文通过分析 1277-1286 年在杜布罗夫尼克工作的公证人 Thomasinus de Savere 所作的遗嘱,探讨了中世纪晚期杜布罗夫尼克(拉古萨)的遗嘱法。德萨维尔是一位受过教育的公证人,出生于意大利雷焦艾米利亚。他对公社主义的教义在杜布罗夫尼克的传播做出了巨大贡献。在确定他对遗嘱法的影响范围时,我将首先研究当时杜布罗夫尼克的继承法,然后分析德萨维尔为当地居民撰写的遗嘱。然后我会将这些遗嘱与德·萨维尔为自己制定的遗嘱(1284)进行比较。后者与为当地人撰写的遗嘱不同,因为它在教义上符合公社法的最新发展。我将讨论这种差异的可能原因和相关性。

更新日期:2023-12-27
down
wechat
bug