当前位置: X-MOL 学术The Legal History Review › 论文详情
Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)
Origen de la teoría sobre la Paráfrasis del Pseudo-Teófilo
The Legal History Review ( IF 0.146 ) Pub Date : 2023-12-22 , DOI: 10.1163/15718190-20233404
Fernando Reinoso-Barbero

Summary

Origin of the theory about the Pseudo-Theophilus’ Paraphrase. – The sudden and abrupt change in Contardo Ferrini’s stance towards Theophilus, is attributed here to the misinterpretation of a letter sent to him by Zachariä von Lingenthal on January 31, 1884, just as his magnificent edition of the Paraphrase was on the brink of publication. This circumstance compels him to hastily modify and adapt its Prolegomena to his new theory, leading to significant unforeseen consequences. Furthermore, due to the rush, he also overlooks making modifications in other sections of his edition where, for this reason, Theophilus is still acknowledged as the author of the Paraphrase.



中文翻译:

伪特奥菲洛原理的起源

概括

伪泰奥菲勒斯释义理论的起源。– 康塔多·费里尼对西奥菲勒斯立场的突然转变,归因于对 1884 年 1 月 31 日扎卡里亚·冯·林根塔尔寄给他的一封信的误解,当时他的精彩版本的释义即将出版。这种情况迫使他仓促修改序言以适应他的新理论,从而导致了不可预见的重大后果。此外,由于仓促,他还忽略了对其版本的其他部分进行修改,因此,提奥菲勒斯仍然被认为是释义的作者。

更新日期:2023-12-27
down
wechat
bug