Since the 1990s, Reinhart Koselleck has been one of the critics of the concept of collective memory. This includes contributions to practical debates on the one hand and reflections on a more theoretical level on the other. In contrast, with her concept of cultural memory, Aleida Assmann has taken a more positive view of the concept of collective memory. She defends this concept against Koselleck’s critical remarks, referring to him as an implicit addressee of her reflections. This essay takes this disagreement as an opportunity to look more closely at the ‘dialogue’ between them by addressing three overlapping aspects, primarily on a theoretical level: the distinction between experience and recollection, the collective conditions of recollection, and the opposition between history of memory and memory of history.

中文翻译：

---

经验与回忆：Reinhart Koselleck 和 Aleida Assmann 论集体记忆

自 20 世纪 90 年代以来，莱因哈特·科塞莱克 (Reinhart Koselleck) 一直是集体记忆概念的批评者之一。这一方面包括对实际辩论的贡献，另一方面包括对更理论层面的反思。相比之下，阿莱达·阿斯曼（Aleida Assmann）在她的文化记忆概念中对集体记忆的概念采取了更为积极的看法。她针对科塞莱克的批评言论捍卫了这一概念，称他是她反思的隐含收件人。本文以这种分歧为契机，通过主要在理论层面上解决三个重叠的方面来更仔细地审视它们之间的“对话”：经验与回忆之间的区别、回忆的集体条件以及历史与记忆之间的对立。历史的记忆和记忆。