Recent developments regarding the pharmacology of psychoactive substances are significant for treating depressions or opioid addictions. Current theories, hypotheses, and models of drug effects assume a cause–effect narrative, which is based on a stimulus/response mechanism. These narratives prioritize effects rather than conscious experiences. In this sense, drug experiences are quickly subsumed into common categories and codes of biological determinism. If subjective experiences are in the focus of the research, it quickly becomes a link to mystical, spiritual, or transcendental narratives. These classifications lead to epistemological doublets (Gadamer). In this article, psychedelic experiences of drug users are analyzed in the frame of the pharmaco-analysis by Deleuze/Guattari. These framed psychedelic experiences are interpreted by means of a non-philosophical approach through philo-fictions (Laruelle), i.e., contradictory assumptions and hyperspeculations. In this respect, the aim of this article is to bring philo-fictions in relation to psychedelic experiences and to discuss them with models of information science, quantum mechanics, new materialism, and the philosophy of immanence. The result will be an open synthesis, with the assumption of further reflections on the agency, immanence, and the wholeness of matter.

中文翻译：

---

迷幻药的药效分析——关于新唯物主义、量子力学、信息科学和内在哲学的哲学小说

精神活性物质药理学的最新进展对于治疗抑郁症或阿片类药物成瘾具有重要意义。当前的药物效应理论、假设和模型假设因果叙述，这是基于刺激/反应机制。这些叙述优先考虑效果而不是意识体验。从这个意义上说，吸毒体验很快就被归入生物决定论的常见类别和代码中。如果主观体验是研究的焦点，它很快就会成为与神秘、精神或超验叙事的联系。这些分类导致了认识论上的双重关系（伽达默尔）。在本文中，德勒兹/加塔里在药物分析的框架内分析了吸毒者的迷幻经历。这些框架迷幻体验通过哲学小说（Laruelle）以非哲学的方式进行解释，即矛盾的假设和过度推测。在这方面，本文的目的是将哲学小说与迷幻体验联系起来，并与信息科学、量子力学、新唯物主义和内在性哲学的模型进行讨论。结果将是一个开放的综合，假设进一步反思物质的作用、内在性和整体性。