In Myanmar (formerly Burma), there is a long history of human rights violation against the Rohingya, an ethnic minority, predominately Muslim and stateless. The international society started giving stronger consideration after the holocaust in 2012 involving over 200 Rohingya, instigated by the majority ethnic group, Rakhine, who are predominately Buddhist. Stakeholders of global and regional governance express concerns for populations who had to flee their residential homelands, whereas stateless people are generally excluded. Typically, refugees with recognized legal nationalities have been the predominant focus of the international community. However, following Myanmar’s military attack against the Rohingya and their subsequent forced relocation in August 2017, international organizations as well as the US government openly criticized the Myanmar government for violent attacks that were labeled as “crimes against humanity,” “genocide,” and “ethnic cleansing.” In the case of the Rohingya, the statelessness status became an additional aspect of a violation of human rights. The authors analyzed the state of global governance in regard to the Rohingya Crisis with constructivist framework which focuses on multiple perspectives among stakeholders. With the results of the analysis, the authors examined the implications for social work practice, including increased sharing along with more involvement of social workers to end this long history of human rights violation.

在缅甸（前缅甸），罗兴亚人的人权受到侵犯的历史由来已久，罗兴亚人是一个少数民族，主要是穆斯林和无国籍人。2012年，在占多数的若开族（以佛教徒为主）的煽动下，涉及200多名罗兴亚人的大屠杀之后，国际社会开始更加关注。全球和区域治理的利益相关者对不得不逃离家园的人们表示担忧，而无国籍人通常被排除在外。通常，具有公认合法国籍的难民一直是国际社会的主要关注焦点。然而，随着2017年8月缅甸对罗兴亚人的军事袭击并随后将罗兴亚人强制搬迁，国际组织和美国政府公开批评缅甸政府的暴力袭击，并将其称为“反人类罪”、“种族灭绝罪”和“反人类罪”。种族清洗。” 就罗兴亚人而言，无国籍状态成为侵犯人权的另一个方面。作者利用建构主义框架分析了罗兴亚危机的全球治理状况，该框架侧重于利益相关者的多种视角。根据分析结果，作者研究了对社会工作实践的影响，包括增加共享以及社会工作者的更多参与，以结束这一长期侵犯人权的历史。