The theological program of Archpriest Georges Florovsky is understood as a conception of the neopatristic synthesis that he developed. From the beginning, its appearance was associated with the participation of its creator in a public discussion about the historical ways of Russia within the framework of the Eurasian movement, then, with his scientific investigations into the history of Russian Orthodoxy and ancient Christian thought and later with his activity in the ecumenical movement. It is noteworthy that the positive content of the program for modern Orthodox theology turned out to be an indirect response to broader challenges of historical and social order. The focus of attention in this case are some peculiarities in the reception of the program in international and Russian contexts, which in turn requires the clarification of the content of its main points, such as a question about a true fatherland or the sense and meaning of Christian Hellenism. The conclusion notes the significant relevance and openness of Florovsky’s ideas for modern Orthodox theology.

大祭司乔治·弗洛洛夫斯基的神学纲领被理解为他所发展的新教父主义 综合概念。从一开始，它的出现就与它的创造者参与欧亚运动框架内关于俄罗斯历史道路的公开讨论有关，然后与他对俄罗斯东正教和古代基督教思想的历史的科学调查有关，后来与他对俄罗斯东正教和古代基督教思想的历史的科学研究有关。与他在普世运动中的活动。值得注意的是，现代东正教神学计划的积极内容实际上是对历史和社会秩序更广泛挑战的间接回应。在这种情况下，关注的焦点是该节目在国际和俄罗斯背景下接受的一些特殊性，这反过来又需要澄清其要点的内容，例如关于真正的祖国的问题或关于祖国的意义和意义的问题。基督教希腊化。结论指出了弗洛洛夫斯基的思想对于现代东正教神学的重要相关性和开放性。