There is a widespread agreement that Nietzsche has developed a kind of position or doctrine called ‘perspectivism’. Scholars go on and develop metaphysical, semantic, epistemic, and psychobiological interpretations of the supposed Nietzschean perspectivism or even ‘perspectivisms’. They engage in debates about whether this perspectivism is relativistic, realistic, or anti-realistic and what the tenets of perspectivism are. In this paper, I suggest putting an end to this practice. I examine Nietzsche’s explicit mentions of the term ‘perspectivism’, the problems associated with the misunderstanding of this term as a label, attempts to reconstruct perspectivism based on explicit mentions of ‘perspective’ and related vocabulary, and doctrinal assumptions scholars try to connect with this terminology.

中文翻译：

---

尼采不是透视主义者

人们普遍认为尼采发展了一种称为“透视主义”的立场或学说。学者们继续对所谓的尼采视角主义甚至“视角主义”进行形而上学、语义学、认识论和心理生物学的解释。他们就这种视角主义是相对主义的、现实主义的还是反现实主义的以及视角主义的原则是什么进行了辩论。在本文中，我建议结束这种做法。我研究了尼采对“视角主义”一词的明确提及，以及与误解该术语作为标签相关的问题，试图根据对“视角”和相关词汇的明确提及来重建视角主义，以及学者们试图与之联系起来的教义假设术语。