Jackson Jr. and Winston (2021) claim there is no taboo against research on race and intelligence. We argue, to the contrary, that there is a taboo against such research. We begin by addressing Jackson Jr. and Winston's arguments concerning expert surveys, as well as their criticisms of our published database of controversies. We then provide additional evidence of the taboo, and explain why it would be expected given the features of academic social science in Western countries. We also point out that Jackson Jr. and Winston's paper exemplifies the very taboo they claim does not exist.

中文翻译：

---

禁忌依然存在：回应批评性评论

Jackson Jr. 和 Winston（2021）声称，种族和智力研究并不存在禁忌。相反，我们认为此类研究存在禁忌。我们首先讨论小杰克逊和温斯顿关于专家调查的论点，以及他们对我们公布的争议数据库的批评。然后，我们提供了该禁忌的更多证据，并解释了鉴于西方国家学术社会科学的特点，为什么会出现这种禁忌。我们还指出，小杰克逊和温斯顿的论文体现了他们声称不存在的禁忌。