Climate litigation in Colombia is increasingly centred on fundamental and/or constitutional human rights. This note evaluates rights-based climate litigation in Colombia through the lens of five cases that protect ecosystems: the Atrato River, the Combeima River, and the Bruno River; the Amazon rainforest; and the Páramos ecosystem. First, the framing of cases is analysed. Second, the judges’ interpretations of the link between constitutional rights and climate change (if any), their reasoning, the scope of the remedies granted, and their intended impact are analysed. Relatedly, the note explores whether decisions that do not explicitly mention climate change can be considered climate cases as their remedies directly or indirectly affect climate change mitigation or adaptation. Finally, the note examines the status of compliance with or implementation of judicial remedies in climate cases.

中文翻译：

---

哥伦比亚基于权利的气候诉讼：对索赔、补救措施和实施的评估

哥伦比亚的气候诉讼越来越集中于基本和/或宪法人权。本说明通过五个保护生态系统的案例来评估哥伦比亚基于权利的气候诉讼：阿特拉托河、孔贝马河和布鲁诺河；亚马逊雨林；和帕拉莫斯生态系统。首先，对案件的框架进行分析。其次，分析了法官对宪法权利与气候变化之间的联系（如果有的话）的解释、其推理、所授予补救措施的范围及其预期影响。与此相关，该说明探讨了未明确提及气候变化的决策是否可以被视为气候案例，因为它们的补救措施直接或间接影响气候变化的缓解或适应。最后，本说明审查了气候案件中司法补救措施的遵守或实施情况。