当前位置: X-MOL 学术J. Clinical Gastroenterol. › 论文详情
Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)
Conventional Versus Traction Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection for Colorectal Tumors: A Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.
Journal of Clinical Gastroenterology ( IF 2.9 ) Pub Date : 2024-01-22 , DOI: 10.1097/mcg.0000000000001973
Sahib Singh 1 , Babu P. Mohan 2 , Saurabh Chandan 3 , Neil Sharma 4 , Rakesh Vinayek 5 , Sudhir Dutta 5 , Sergey V. Kantsevoy 6 , Michelle Le 7 , Douglas G. Adler 8
Affiliation  

Compared with conventional endoscopic submucosal dissection (C-ESD) for colorectal lesions, the traction method (T-ESD) allows the lesion to be stabilized with easier dissection. However, randomized controlled trials (RCTs) have reported conflicting results on the clinical outcomes of T-ESD as compared with C-ESD. We conducted a meta-analysis to compile the data.

中文翻译:

结直肠肿瘤的传统与牵引内镜粘膜下剥离术:随机对照试验的荟萃分析。

与传统的内镜粘膜下剥离术(C-ESD)治疗结直肠病变相比,牵引法(T-ESD)可以使病变稳定且更容易剥离。然而,随机对照试验 (RCT) 报告了与 C-ESD 相比 T-ESD 临床结果相互矛盾的结果。我们进行了荟萃分析来编译数据。
更新日期:2024-01-22
down
wechat
bug