Is it possible to identify traces of dissent or even resistance to Francoism within a single fascist party? Can there be elements of radical opposition within fascism in its long duration? This article’s discussion of this question, centered on the Spanish Falange’s case, will focus on two main topics that define the parameters of historiographical discussion of an idealized (‘authentic’, ‘pure’, ‘uncontaminated’, ‘rebellious’) fascism that may also be useful for interpreting and establishing comparisons with other contexts. The first of these topics is the mythification of fascism’s original authenticity and the second is the preeminence of Franco’s providentialist leadership and how it explicitly demonstrates his de facto importance in the construction of the dictatorial regime as a fascist regime through the exercise of power.

是否有可能在一个法西斯政党内部发现对弗朗哥主义的异议甚至抵抗的痕迹？长期存在的法西斯主义内部是否存在激进反对的因素？本文对这个问题的讨论以西班牙长枪党的案例为中心，将集中在两个主要主题上，这两个主题定义了理想化（“真实的”、“纯粹的”、“未受污染的”、“叛逆的”）法西斯主义的史学讨论的参数。对于解释和与其他上下文进行比较也很有用。第一个主题是对法西斯主义原始真实性的神话，第二个主题是佛朗哥天意主义领导的卓越性，以及它如何明确地表明他在通过行使权力将独裁政权建设为法西斯政权方面的事实上的重要性。