Abstract:

Some patients tediously describe depictions of their sexual perversions. These can bring the analyst to feel intense boredom and frustration. This "almost unavoidable monotony" can be interpreted in various ways. It can be seen as an expression of the patient's compulsion to repeat, whether one considers it a product of the death drive, or the need to give meaning to the traumatic experience that caused the perversion itself. On the other hand, it may be seen as an aspect of the unconscious emotional function that binds the couple together in the analysis. Monotony, then, is no longer intrinsic to "the patient's" perversion, but becomes the search for "mono-tony" or "at-one-ment" in the here and now of the session. At the root of this may be the fear of the tensions that arise from confrontation and difference, which may cause the pair to stay rigidly on the same wave. Then, analyst and patient maintain an adhesive identification with each other to prevent separation, and they pay the price of boredom and immobility. The field theory point of view is distinguished by two important aspects. As the analyst listens from the perspective of a "narrative We," this protects the pair from a judgmental attitude and, consequently, from a form of perversion of the analytic relationship. Second, it detects precise and distinct signs of how the process of mutual recognition unfolds on the level of the third, intersubjective or "common," unconscious. The fundamental postulate is that psychic suffering, including that which is expressed in sadomasochism, stems from important deficits in this same process in the primal relationship to the object. Consequently, it is important to privilege the level of being-with rather than that of knowing-about.

摘要：

一些患者乏味地描述了他们的性变态。这些会让分析师感到强烈的无聊和沮丧。这种“几乎不可避免的单调”可以有多种解释。它可以被视为患者强迫性重复的一种表达，无论人们认为这是死亡驱力的产物，还是需要赋予导致变态本身的创伤经历以意义。另一方面，它可能被视为在分析中将夫妻联系在一起的无意识情感功能的一个方面。那么，单调不再是“病人”变态所固有的，而是成为在此时此刻的治疗中寻找“单调”或“一体”。其根源可能是担心对抗和差异所产生的紧张局势，这可能导致两人僵化地保持在同一波浪潮上。然后，分析师和病人彼此保持一种粘性的认同，以防止分离，他们付出了无聊和不动的代价。场论的观点有两个重要的方面。当分析师从“叙事的我们”的角度倾听时，这可以保护两人免受评判态度，从而避免分析关系的某种形式的扭曲。其次，它检测到相互识别过程如何在第三主体间或“共同”无意识层面上展开的精确而明显的迹象。基本假设是，精神痛苦，包括施虐受虐中所表达的痛苦，源于与客体的原始关系的同一过程中的重要缺陷。因此，重要的是优先考虑“共处”的水平，而不是“了解”的水平。