In this article I question notions of urban liminality by foregrounding the temporal, spatial and experiential dimensions underpinning their formations. I focus on liminal practices of inhabitation in the context of a housing squat in Rome, Italy, by investigating how a permanent housing deprivation condition, once politically organized in a squatted building, can anchor processes of empowerment and political mobilization. To do so, I put forward a rereading of liminality, not necessarily as a temporary state but rather as a more comprehensive spatial–temporal assemblage, by offering a tripartite reading of liminal conditions in their spatial, temporal and experiential dimensions. My goal is to offer an analysis of urban and housing liminality that transcends totalizing narratives of exceptionality, temporariness or straightforward annihilation, advancing instead a more nuanced reading—where liminality can be seen either as a vehicle for social depotentiation or as the grounds for collective forms of emancipatory practices.

中文翻译：

---

居住限制：意大利罗马占屋者生活中解放实践的时间、空间和经验组合

在这篇文章中，我通过突出支撑城市阈限形成的时间、空间和体验维度来质疑城市阈限的概念。我通过调查永久性住房剥夺条件一旦在占屋建筑中进行政治组织，如何能够锚定赋权和政治动员的进程，重点关注意大利罗马占屋背景下的居住实践。为此，我提出了对阈限的重新解读，不一定是一种临时状态，而是一种更全面的时空组合，通过对阈限条件在空间、时间和经验维度上的三方解读。我的目标是提供对城市和住房阈限的分析，超越对例外性、暂时性或直接毁灭的总体叙述，而是推进一种更细致的解读——阈限既可以被视为社会权力丧失的工具，也可以被视为集体形式的基础的解放实践。