Over the past two decades, the relatively young field of global history has generated remarkable excitement among students, scholars, and readers who want to read scholarship that crosses borders and brings many worlds to a single methodological framework. Global perspectives have been particularly fruitful for telling political histories that have defined the modern world. Today, there is increasing scholarly interest in writing global intellectual histories of decolonisation and anti-colonialism. In the pages that follow, I consider new work, situated in several disciplines, that pushes the methodological boundaries of historical inquiry into our connected pasts. These works include Daniel Elam's World Literature for the Wretched of the Earth; Madhumita Lahiri's Imperfect Solidarities; Peace on Our Terms by Mona L. Siegel; and The Fury Archives by Juno Jill Richards.

在过去的二十年里，全球史这个相对年轻的领域引起了学生、学者和读者的极大兴趣，他们想要阅读跨越国界并将许多世界带入单一方法论框架的学术成果。全球视角对于讲述定义现代世界的政治历史尤其富有成效。如今，学术界对撰写非殖民化和反殖民主义的全球思想史越来越感兴趣。在接下来的几页中，我考虑了位于多个学科的新作品，它们将历史探究的方法论界限推向了我们相互联系的过去。这些作品包括丹尼尔·埃拉姆（Daniel Elam）的《地球受苦者世界文学》； Madhumita Lahiri 的不完美团结；莫娜·L·西格尔《按照我们的条件和平》；以及朱诺·吉尔·理查兹的《愤怒档案》。