It is common practice for researchers to monitor responses to items assessing suicidal ideation and follow-up with high-risk participants, when their identities are known. However, it is becoming increasingly common for researchers to administer fully anonymous online surveys that do not allow for follow-ups with participants at higher risk. The aim of the current study was to investigate whether these two different approaches—monitoring and follow-up versus no monitoring or follow-up—affect the willingness of participants to endorse suicidal ideation.

中文翻译：

---

在在线研究中检查反应监测指令对自杀意念认可的影响

研究人员的常见做法是，在已知高风险参与者的身份后，监测他们对评估自杀意念的项目的反应并对其进行跟进。然而，研究人员管理完全匿名的在线调查变得越来越普遍，这些调查不允许对风险较高的参与者进行后续调查。本研究的目的是调查这两种不同的方法（监测和随访与不监测或随访）是否会影响参与者认可自杀意念的意愿。