Much of the resistance and, at times, outright condemnation of including transgender individuals in sports continue to draw upon “scientific” arguments, despite the acknowledged importance of sociocultural and (geo)political factors, resulting in a constructed “either science or human rights” landscape. In this article, I analyze historical scientifically driven International Olympic Committee documents and policies from the Olympic Studies Center to examine if and how sport organizations, such as the International Olympic Committee, have historically balanced these seemingly partitioned considerations in previous regulatory documents, especially those relating to sex, gender, fairness, and protection. Using Sheila Jasanoff’s co-production, I find that, while knowledge informing policies sometimes circulates biologized gender stereotypes, sociocultural and scientific goals have, can, and should exist in cohesion rather than in contradiction.

尽管社会文化和（地缘）政治因素的重要性已得到公认，但对将跨性别者纳入体育运动的许多抵制和有时的直接谴责仍然继续利用“科学”论点，从而导致构建的“科学或人权”景观。在本文中，我分析了奥林匹克研究中心的历史科学驱动的国际奥委会文件和政策，以研究国际奥委会等体育组织在历史上是否以及如何平衡以前监管文件中这些看似分散的考虑因素，特别是那些与性别、性别、公平和保护。通过希拉·贾桑诺夫的联合制作，我发现，虽然政策知识有时会传播生物化的性别陈规定型观念，但社会文化和科学目标已经、可以而且应该以凝聚力而不是矛盾的方式存在。