ObjectiveOur study aimed to review the outcome measures/assessment instruments used and to assess their heterogeneity/homogeneity in eating disorders (EDs) randomised controlled trials.MethodsAPA PsycInfo, PubMed, and Embase were searched in December 2022 to identify studies published between and inclusive of January 2012 and December 2022. Inclusion/exclusion criteria were: (1) complete articles published in peer‐reviewed scientific journals, which were: (2) randomised trials, (3) in a clinical setting (4) with human subjects, (5) with an ICD or DSM diagnosis of Anorexia Nervosa, Binge Eating Disorder, or Bulimia Nervosa. The selected papers also: (6) used one or more standardised instruments designed to measure one or more psychometric characteristics associated with ED as a primary or secondary outcome, as judged by the authors of this systematic review, and (7) were published in English or Danish.ResultsNinety one articles were included, and a total of 196 outcome measures were collected.DiscussionThe diversity of outcome measures in ED trials hampers result comparability and data integration. We suggest creating a core outcome measure set using the Delphi method, including clinician and patient‐reported ED assessments, along with relevant comorbidity scales.

中文翻译：

---

让我们对齐吧！制定饮食失调临床试验的核心结果集

目的我们的研究旨在回顾所使用的结果测量/评估工具，并评估其在饮食失调 (ED) 随机对照试验中的异质性/同质性。方法于 2022 年 12 月检索了 APA PsycInfo、PubMed 和 Embase，以识别 1 月（含）期间发表的研究2012 年和 2022 年 12 月。纳入/排除标准为：(1) 在同行评审的科学期刊上发表的完整文章，其中：(2) 随机试验，(3) 在临床环境中，(4) 人类受试者，(5)经 ICD 或 DSM 诊断为神经性厌食症、暴食症或神经性贪食症。所选论文还：(6) 使用一种或多种标准化工具，旨在测量与 ED 相关的一种或多种心理测量特征，作为主要或次要结果（根据本系统评价的作者的判断），以及 (7) 以英文发表结果纳入了 91 篇文章，总共收集了 196 个结局指标。讨论 ED 试验中结局指标的多样性阻碍了结果的可比性和数据整合。我们建议使用德尔菲法创建一个核心结果测量集，包括临床医生和患者报告的急诊评估，以及相关的合并症量表。