A 2 (jargon vs. no jargon) × 3 (motive: control vs. accuracy vs. impression) between-subjects experiment examined the impact of jargon and processing motive in correcting climate change misinformation and promoting policy support. The results revealed a positive effect of jargon use when participants were asked to focus on accuracy during information processing. This effect was mediated by reduced anger, increased systematic processing, and enhanced perceptions of message credibility. However, jargon had a negative effect when no specific motive was induced, and it did not make a difference in correction outcomes when participants were asked to focus on making positive social impressions. These findings provide theoretical implications for information processing and practical insights for addressing misinformation in the context of climate change.

中文翻译：

---

克服错误信息纠正中的确认偏差：处理动机和行话对气候变化政策支持的影响

一项 2（行话与无行话）× 3（动机：控制、准确性与印象）受试者间实验检验了行话和处理动机在纠正气候变化错误信息和促进政策支持方面的影响。结果显示，当参与者被要求在信息处理过程中关注准确性时，行话的使用会产生积极的影响。这种效果是通过减少愤怒、增加系统处理和增强对信息可信度的感知来调节的。然而，当没有诱发特定动机时，行话会产生负面影响，并且当参与者被要求专注于创造积极的社会印象时，行话不会对纠正结果产生影响。这些发现为信息处理提供了理论意义，并为解决气候变化背景下的错误信息提供了实际见解。