Background:There is little and heterogeneous knowledge on the links between the temperamental predispositions of psychopathology and the contemporary dimensional models of psychopathology, such as the Hierarchical Taxonomy of Psychopathology (HiTOP) classification system, which can be aligned with the five-factor model (FFM) of personality. This meta-analysis seeks to expand the temperamental theoretical basis of the HiTOP model by incorporating associations of temperament traits of two temperamental theories measured, respectively, by the Temperament and Character Inventory (TCI) and the Temperament Evaluation of Memphis, Pisa, Paris, and San Diego Autoquestionnaire (TEMPS-A) with (a) the FFM’s personality domains and (b) HiTOP’s five psychopathological spectra.Methods:A systematic search was done on Web of Science, Scopus, PubMed, ProQuest, Cochrane Database, and Google Scholar for all articles published in English from January 1990 to August 2020. Because of heterogeneity in the results of almost 70% of studies, pooled estimates of correlation coefficients were calculated using the random-effects method. Risk of bias (low-quality studies) and publication bias are reported.Results:The pooled correlations obtained from the analysis of 35 studies showed that the temperamental profile associated with each FFM domain and HiTOP spectra is distinct. Specifically, TCI-harm avoidance (HA) and all TEMPS temperaments were more strongly related to neuroticism/internalizing, extraversion/low detachment, and conscientiousness/disinhibition. In contrast, TCI-novelty seeking was more strongly related to both disinhibited/antagonistic externalizing and thought disorder.Conclusions:A large body of research supports maladaptive variants of all FFM domains and some psychopathological spectra of HiTOP related to the abnormal-range temperaments.

中文翻译：

---

五因素模型的气质相关性和精神病理学领域的层次分类法的荟萃分析回顾

背景：关于精神病理学的气质倾向与精神病理学的当代维度模型之间的联系，例如精神病理学的层次分类法（HiTOP）分类系统，可以与五因素模型（FFM）保持一致，但知之甚少且异构。 ）的个性。这项荟萃分析旨在通过纳入分别通过气质和性格调查表（TCI）以及孟菲斯、比萨、巴黎和巴黎的气质评估测量的两种气质理论的气质特征的关联来扩展 HiTOP 模型的气质理论基础。圣地亚哥自动问卷 (TEMPS-A)，包含 (a) FFM 的人格领域和 (b) HiTOP 的五种精神病理学谱。方法：在 Web of Science、Scopus、PubMed、ProQuest、Cochrane 数据库和 Google Scholar 上进行了系统搜索1990 年 1 月至 2020 年 8 月期间以英文发表的所有文章。由于近 70% 的研究结果存在异质性，相关系数的汇总估计值是使用随机效应方法计算的。报告了偏倚风险（低质量研究）和发表偏倚。结果：从 35 项研究的分析中获得的汇总相关性表明，与每个 FFM 域和 HiTOP 谱相关的气质特征是不同的。具体来说，TCI 伤害回避 (HA) 和所有 TEMPS 气质与神经质/内化、外向/低疏离和责任心/抑制解除密切相关。相比之下，TCI 新奇寻求与去抑制/对抗性外化和思维障碍的相关性更强。结论：大量研究支持所有 FFM 领域的适应不良变体以及与异常范围气质相关的 HiTOP 的一些精神病理学谱。