In 2015, Vaziri and Magennis – the first case on female genital mutilation (FGM) – was prosecuted in Australia. Three people were convicted. In 2018, the NSW Court of Criminal Appeal ruled that the judgment was a ‘potential miscarriage of justice’. The prosecution pushed for ‘leave to appeal’ to the High Court of Australia and for consideration of the meaning of mutilation. The appeal was held in 2019, and the NSWCCA judgment was overturned. In this article, I examine the absence of discussions of male circumcision and female genital cosmetic surgery in this case and ask not only what form of cut produces a legal definition of mutilation, but where this cut must be and on what form of body.

中文翻译：

---

残害在哪里？了解高等法院对 Vaziri 和 Magennis 案中女性生殖器切割的审议

2015 年，瓦齐里和马格尼斯——第一起女性生殖器切割 (FGM) 案件——在澳大利亚被起诉。三人被定罪。2018年，新南威尔士州刑事上诉法院裁定该判决“可能存在误判”。检方敦促澳大利亚高等法院“允许上诉”，并考虑残害的含义。上诉于2019年进行，NSWCCA的判决被推翻。在本文中，我研究了本案中对男性包皮环切术和女性生殖器整容手术缺乏讨论的情况，并不仅询问哪种形式的切割会产生残割的法律定义，而且询问这种切割必须在哪里以及在什么形式的身体上进行。