Quantitative research has an omitted variable problem when it comes to measuring and modeling non-criminal threats in the urban environment. This systematic review identified questionnaires and surveys used to measure incidences of street harassment/harassment in public, to discuss how they operationalize street harassment/harassment in public, and to report the characteristics of those with the best evidence of reliability and validity. We searched five databases and included peer-reviewed articles published in English from 1994 to 2022 that measured street harassment using a survey instrument. Our search resulted in 54 included studies. Of these studies, 16 primarily focused on understanding street harassment. To design effective prevention strategies in response to street harassment, research must first effectively measure the prevalence of street harassment and the contexts in which street harassment occurs. Due to the inconsistencies in definition, our review identified prevalence rates were inconsistent. Incidents of street harassment provide a promising avenue for future research, although scholars must first seek to appropriately operationalize this concept in survey research. We provide suggestions for future research that seeks to use surveys to understand harassment in public places.

中文翻译：

---

使用调查工具实施街头骚扰：使用调查衡量公共场所骚扰的系统回顾

在测量和建模城市环境中的非犯罪威胁时，定量研究存在遗漏变量问题。这项系统审查确定了用于衡量街头骚扰/公共骚扰发生率的问卷和调查，讨论如何实施街头骚扰/公共骚扰，并报告具有最佳可靠性和有效性证据的特征。我们检索了五个数据库，纳入了 1994 年至 2022 年以英文发表的同行评审文章，这些文章使用调查工具衡量街头骚扰情况。我们的检索纳入了 54 项研究。在这些研究中，16 项主要侧重于了解街头骚扰。为了设计针对街头骚扰的有效预防策略，研究必须首先有效衡量街头骚扰的普遍程度以及街头骚扰发生的背景。由于定义不一致，我们的审查确定的患病率也不一致。街头骚扰事件为未来的研究提供了一个有希望的途径，尽管学者们必须首先寻求在调查研究中适当地运用这一概念。我们为未来的研究提供建议，旨在利用调查来了解公共场所的骚扰情况。