The article aims to theorize about critical data studies with Latin America beyond the framework of data colonialism, arguing that the long history of social thought in the region can contribute to a more nuanced understanding of the datafication. It discusses views around dependence, oppressions, and liberation, debating how Latin American authors can be useful for current critical data studies, in a more nuanced and complex vision. It presents the theoretical contributions of Lelia Gonzalez, dependency theorists and Enrique Dussel. Dependency theorists criticize evolutionary frameworks of development and can contribute to discussions around data sovereignty and overexploitation of labor. Gonzalez contributes to a complex vision of Amefrica Ladina, articulating multiple forms of oppression. Enrique Dussel presents a theory of technology considering totality and proposes an ethics of liberation that can be related to alternatives toward data justice and data commons. All theoretical frameworks contribute to thinking about datafication with Latin America not as an isolated phenomenon, but in relation to other countries in the world, and as an analytical key for the construction of alternatives. All perspectives are related to current debates on critical data studies and can make an important contribution to the construction of critical theories about data that consider Latin America also as a site of knowledge production.

中文翻译：

---

拉丁美洲的关键数据研究：超越数据殖民主义的理论

本文旨在超越数据殖民主义的框架，对拉丁美洲的关键数据研究进行理论化，认为该地区悠久的社会思想历史有助于对数据化有更细致的理解。它讨论了关于依赖、压迫和解放的观点，讨论了拉丁美洲作者如何以更细致和复杂的视角对当前的关键数据研究有用。它介绍了莱利亚·冈萨雷斯、依附理论家和恩里克·杜塞尔的理论贡献。依赖理论家批评发展的进化框架，并可以为围绕数据主权和过度剥削劳动力的讨论做出贡献。冈萨雷斯为美国拉迪纳的复杂愿景做出了贡献，阐明了多种形式的压迫。恩里克·杜塞尔（Enrique Dussel）提出了一种考虑整体性的技术理论，并提出了一种与数据正义和数据共享的替代方案相关的解放伦理学。所有理论框架都有助于思考拉丁美洲的数据化不是一种孤立的现象，而是与世界其他国家的关系，并作为构建替代方案的分析关键。所有观点都与当前关于关键数据研究的辩论有关，并且可以为构建将拉丁美洲也视为知识生产场所的数据批判理论做出重要贡献。