Abstract

In this article, I will explore the enactive approach to science and the pragmatic motifs that guide it. In particular, in the first half of the article, I will discuss to what extent enactivism can be seen as a philosophy of nature, and by comparing it with Sellars’s interpretation of the conflict between the manifest and the scientific image of humans in the world, I will focus on the view of nature that enactivism defends. In the second part, I will compare the enactive approach with Dewey’s conception of the organism-environment interaction by focusing on the underlying similarities between their views of evolution and their way of seeing science as the most sophisticated expression of an organism’s sense-making.

中文翻译：

---

理解科学研究的意义：关于指导科学的积极方法的一些务实主题

摘要

在本文中，我将探讨科学的积极方法以及指导它的务实主题。特别是，在文章的前半部分，我将讨论生成主义在多大程度上可以被视为一种自然哲学，并将其与塞拉斯对世界上人类的显性形象和科学形象之间的冲突的解释进行比较，我将重点讨论行动主义所捍卫的自然观。在第二部分中，我将比较主动方法与杜威的有机体与环境相互作用的概念，重点关注他们的进化论观点和他们将科学视为有机体意义建构的最复杂表达的方式之间的潜在相似性。