当前位置: X-MOL 学术J. Nat. Conserv. › 论文详情
Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)
A comparative analysis of the coupling and coordination between the ecological civilization construction and tourism development in different types of resource-based cities
Journal for Nature Conservation ( IF 2 ) Pub Date : 2024-02-28 , DOI: 10.1016/j.jnc.2024.126563
Huangting Deng , Jing Hu

Resource-based cities are an important concern for the construction of ecological civilization in China, and developing tourism is an important direction for the transformation of resource-based cities. Based on the mechanism of the coupling and coordination effect of ecological civilization construction and tourism development, four different types of resource-based cities in China, Wuwei City (growing type), Pingliang City (mature type), Baiyin City (declining type) and Zhangye City (regenerative type), were selected as the research area. Based on the improved entropy weight method, coupling coordination model and obstacle model, the evaluation index system of ecological civilization construction and tourism development in resource-based cities was constructed, and its coupling development status and obstacle factors were analyzed. According to the results: (1) From 2013 to 2020, the comprehensive scores of ecological civilization construction of four different types of resource-based cities were higher than that of tourism development. They were divided into two gradients according to the comprehensive score of ecological civilization construction. The first gradient was the regeneration and maturity of resource-based cities, while the other gradient was growth and decline of resource-based cities. The comprehensive score of tourism development of four resource-based cities were regeneration, maturity, growth and decline in turn. (2) The coupling degree between regenerative and mature resource-based cities was the best. All of them were in the period of coordinated coupling during the study period, and the coupling degree tended to 1. (3) The regenerative resource city had the highest degree of coupling and coordination between the two systems, followed by mature, growing and finally declining type. (4) Among growing, mature, and declining resource-based cities, the obstacle degree of the tourism development system layer was always higher than that of the ecological civilization construction system layer, while the result was the opposite for regenerative resource-based cities.

中文翻译:

不同类型资源型城市生态文明建设与旅游发展耦合协调性比较分析

资源型城市是我国生态文明建设的重要关切,发展旅游业是资源型城市转型的重要方向。基于生态文明建设与旅游业发展的耦合协调效应机制,我国四种不同类型的资源型城市:武威市(成长型)、平凉市(成熟型)、白银市(衰退型)和选择张掖市(再生型)作为研究区域。基于改进的熵权法、耦合协调模型和障碍模型,构建资源型城市生态文明建设与旅游发展评价指标体系,并分析其耦合发展现状和障碍因素。结果显示:(1)2013年至2020年,4个不同类型的资源型城市生态文明建设综合得分均高于旅游发展得分。根据生态文明建设综合得分分为两个梯度。第一个梯度是资源型城市的再生和成熟,另一个梯度是资源型城市的成长和衰落。四个资源型城市旅游发展综合得分依次为再生、成熟、增长、衰退。(2)再生型资源型城市与成熟型资源型城市耦合度最好。研究期间均处于协调耦合期,耦合度趋于1。(3)再生资源城市两系统耦合协调度最高,其次是成熟期、成长期,最后是再生资源城市。衰退型。(4)在成长型、成熟型和衰退型资源型城市中,旅游发展系统层的障碍度始终高于生态文明建设系统层的障碍度,而再生型资源型城市则相反。
更新日期:2024-02-28
down
wechat
bug