当前位置: X-MOL 学术Violence Against Women › 论文详情
Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)
Clinical and Advocacy Implications of the Dobbs vs. Jackson Women's Health Organization Ruling on Trafficked Persons
Violence Against Women ( IF 2.586 ) Pub Date : 2024-03-01 , DOI: 10.1177/10778012241231779
Ila Gautham 1 , John Coverdale 1, 2, 3, 4 , Phuong T. Nguyen 1, 4 , Mollie R. Gordon 1, 2, 4
Affiliation  

The United States Supreme Court decision on the case of Dobbs vs. Jackson Women's Health Organization abolished federal protections of abortion, leaving abortion legislation at the discretion of individual states. Trafficked persons are a population especially vulnerable to the impacts of this ruling. Because there is no existing literature describing the effects of restrictive abortion legislation on this group, we described some of the potential consequences of restrictive abortion laws for sex and labor trafficked persons, based on real case examples. We describe steps that should be taken to sufficiently protect and support pregnant trafficked women in relation to the Dobbs law.

中文翻译:

多布斯诉杰克逊妇女健康组织关于被贩运者的裁决的临床和倡导意义

美国最高法院对多布斯诉杰克逊妇女健康组织案的裁决废除了联邦对堕胎的保护,使堕胎立法由各州自行决定。被贩运者是特别容易受到这一裁决影响的人群。由于没有现有文献描述限制性堕胎立法对这一群体的影响,我们根据真实案例描述了限制性堕胎法对性贩运和劳工贩运者的一些潜在后果。我们描述了根据多布斯法充分保护和支持被贩运孕妇应采取的步骤。
更新日期:2024-03-01
down
wechat
bug