Over the seven decades of its existence, the European Court of Justice (ECJ) has performed well as a conflict-solving institution. From the existing literature, it becomes less clear however to what extent it served as an effective agent for societal change. Obtaining clarity on this issue seems imperative in the current day and age, considering the gargantuan challenges of accelerating climate change and environmental degradation: if the ECJ generally manages to ‘deliver’, at least some further progress could realistically be expected on this front also. The present article conducts an examination reviewing the experiences in the green domain from a comparative perspective, seeking to discern possible patterns and draw common inferences. Thus, it aims to expose how and when judges prove successful in recalibrating the conduct or opinions of real people in actual practice. Those insights may well inform future progress in different fields—the ecological as much as anywhere.

中文翻译：

---

欧洲法院是否会引发社会变革？迄今为止的记录——着眼于绿色未来

欧洲法院（ECJ）成立七十年以来，作为冲突解决机构表现良好。然而，从现有文献来看，它在多大程度上充当了社会变革的有效推动者，这一点还不太清楚。考虑到气候变化加速和环境退化所面临的巨大挑战，在当今时代，澄清这一问题似乎势在必行：如果欧洲法院总体上能够“兑现”承诺，至少在这方面也有望取得一些进一步的进展。本文从比较的角度回顾绿色领域的经验，试图找出可能的模式并得出共同的推论。因此，它的目的是揭示法官如何以及何时在实际实践中成功地重新调整真实人们的行为或观点。这些见解很可能为不同领域（生态领域以及其他领域）未来的进展提供信息。