In decision making, conformity to a specification like a reference value or a requirement, the decision rule applied shall be documented. Furthermore, if the measurement uncertainty is considered in the decision process the associated probability, or risk, that a measurement result is above (or below) a reference value shall be taken into account. In this work it is shown that for gross alpha and gross beta measurements the evaluation method, GUMUF (GUM Uncertainty Framework) or MC (Monte Carlo), may also be important and influence the decisions taken when measurement results are very close to the reference value. Therefore the evaluation method and assumptions of the input quantities may also be important to document. Moreover, decision makers or users of measurement results should be aware of possible differences and/or consequences due to the evaluation method regardless of the decision rule and the choice of evaluation method.

中文翻译：

---

论测量评估方法在决策中的重要性：JCGM 101 和 JCGM 106 的综合应用于使用 LSC 的总 α 和总 β 测量

在决策过程中，为了符合参考值或要求等规范，所应用的决策规则应记录在案。此外，如果在决策过程中考虑测量不确定性，则应考虑测量结果高于（或低于）参考值的相关概率或风险。这项工作表明，对于总 α 和总 β 测量，评估方法 GUMUF（GUM 不确定性框架）或 MC（蒙特卡罗）也可能很重要，并且会影响测量结果非常接近参考值时所采取的决策。因此，评估方法和输入量的假设对于记录也很重要。此外，无论决策规则和评估方法的选择如何，决策者或测量结果的使用者都应该意识到由于评估方法而可能产生的差异和/或后果。